Why was boycott considered an effective weapon in the Non-Cooperation Movement?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because it reduced public cooperation with colonial institutions
Boycott was effective because colonial administration depended partly on the participation of Indians in schools, courts, councils, and the market for foreign goods. When people withdrew from these institutions and refused imported products, the legitimacy and functioning of colonial rule were challenged. Option A is correct. Options B, C, and D are incorrect because boycott weakened foreign economic and administrative influence while encouraging, rather than ending, Indian participation and swadeshi.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because it reduced public cooperation with colonial institutions
Why is this the correct answer?
Boycott was effective because colonial administration depended partly on the participation of Indians in schools, courts, councils, and the market for foreign goods. When people withdrew from these institutions and refused imported products, the legitimacy and functioning of colonial rule were challenged. Option A is correct. Options B, C, and D are incorrect because boycott weakened foreign economic and administrative influence while encouraging, rather than ending, Indian participation and swadeshi.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
