Why did the withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement show that controlling a mass movement was difficult?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because in huge mass participation local anger could sometimes turn violent
The governing concept is the difficulty of maintaining common discipline in a diverse mass movement. Participants came from different regions, classes, and local experiences, so their grievances and responses were not identical. In such conditions, local anger could become violent, as at Chauri Chaura, even when national leaders demanded non-violence. Options B and D deny the movement’s diversity and scale, while C reverses the historical relationship.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because in huge mass participation local anger could sometimes turn violent
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is the difficulty of maintaining common discipline in a diverse mass movement. Participants came from different regions, classes, and local experiences, so their grievances and responses were not identical. In such conditions, local anger could become violent, as at Chauri Chaura, even when national leaders demanded non-violence. Options B and D deny the movement’s diversity and scale, while C reverses the historical relationship.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
