Why can it be said that the Non-Cooperation Movement was not merely a negative boycott?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because it also had constructive aspects like swadeshi, national education and self-reliance
The movement certainly used negative measures such as the boycott of government schools, courts, titles and foreign cloth. However, it also promoted constructive alternatives: khadi, spinning, swadeshi production, national educational institutions and self-reliance. These activities aimed to build Indian capacity while challenging colonial authority. Option A is therefore correct. Option B denies the boycott, while C and D contradict the movement’s objectives and mass participation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because it also had constructive aspects like swadeshi, national education and self-reliance
Why is this the correct answer?
The movement certainly used negative measures such as the boycott of government schools, courts, titles and foreign cloth. However, it also promoted constructive alternatives: khadi, spinning, swadeshi production, national educational institutions and self-reliance. These activities aimed to build Indian capacity while challenging colonial authority. Option A is therefore correct. Option B denies the boycott, while C and D contradict the movement’s objectives and mass participation.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
