What is the most correct caution while analysing peasant participation in the Non-Cooperation Movement?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: They should not be understood only through a uniform Congress programme
Peasant participation had a dual character. Many peasants responded to the national call against colonial rule, but they also pursued local demands such as reduction of rent, relief from illegal levies, abolition of begar, and protection from landlords or officials. Their actions therefore cannot be explained by a single uniform Congress programme. Option A is correct; the other choices wrongly detach or misclassify peasant struggles.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
They should not be understood only through a uniform Congress programme
Why is this the correct answer?
Peasant participation had a dual character. Many peasants responded to the national call against colonial rule, but they also pursued local demands such as reduction of rent, relief from illegal levies, abolition of begar, and protection from landlords or officials. Their actions therefore cannot be explained by a single uniform Congress programme. Option A is correct; the other choices wrongly detach or misclassify peasant struggles.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
