How did the boycott of council elections challenge colonial rule?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: By weakening the legitimacy of colonial political institutions
The boycott of council elections was a method of non-cooperation with colonial institutions. Legislative councils appeared to offer representation, but real authority remained with the colonial government. When nationalists and citizens refused to contest or participate, they withheld cooperation and exposed the limited legitimacy of these bodies. Therefore, option A is correct. The other choices describe effects opposite to the movement’s purpose: the boycott did not strengthen British laws, increase foreign-cloth sales, or speed up tax collection.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
By weakening the legitimacy of colonial political institutions
Why is this the correct answer?
The boycott of council elections was a method of non-cooperation with colonial institutions. Legislative councils appeared to offer representation, but real authority remained with the colonial government. When nationalists and citizens refused to contest or participate, they withheld cooperation and exposed the limited legitimacy of these bodies. Therefore, option A is correct. The other choices describe effects opposite to the movement’s purpose: the boycott did not strengthen British laws, increase foreign-cloth sales, or speed up tax collection.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
