Boycott of colonial institutions in the Non-Cooperation Movement was not only symbolic because what did it do?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: It challenged the actual administrative and moral power of the rule
The governing concept is withdrawal of cooperation as a practical challenge to colonial authority. Schools, courts, councils, titles and other institutions depended partly on Indian participation and recognition. Boycotting them therefore reduced cooperation, questioned the government’s legitimacy and could disrupt administration, not merely display protest. Option A is correct. The other options either reverse the effect or describe outcomes unrelated to the purpose of the boycott.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
It challenged the actual administrative and moral power of the rule
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is withdrawal of cooperation as a practical challenge to colonial authority. Schools, courts, councils, titles and other institutions depended partly on Indian participation and recognition. Boycotting them therefore reduced cooperation, questioned the government’s legitimacy and could disrupt administration, not merely display protest. Option A is correct. The other options either reverse the effect or describe outcomes unrelated to the purpose of the boycott.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 Social Science question. Chapter: Chapter 2: Nationalism in India. Topic: The First World War, Khilafat, and Non-Cooperation.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
