Why was Simon Commission opposed for having no Indian member?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Because Indians' participation and opinion were essential on India's constitutional future
The British government appointed the Simon Commission to review constitutional reforms in India, but every member was British. Indians opposed it because they believed that Indians must be represented in decisions about India’s government and constitutional future. Option B is unrelated to the commission’s purpose, while the Bhoodan Movement and the Dandi March were separate movements. Exam tip: remember the famous protest slogan, “Simon Go Back.”
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Because Indians' participation and opinion were essential on India's constitutional future
Why is this the correct answer?
The British government appointed the Simon Commission to review constitutional reforms in India, but every member was British. Indians opposed it because they believed that Indians must be represented in decisions about India’s government and constitutional future. Option B is unrelated to the commission’s purpose, while the Bhoodan Movement and the Dandi March were separate movements. Exam tip: remember the famous protest slogan, “Simon Go Back.”
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 General Knowledge question. Chapter: Indian History. Topic: Important Revolts and Movements.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
