Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why was provincial autonomy under the Government of India Act 1935 limited?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Governor's special powers and British control remained

The Government of India Act 1935 introduced provincial autonomy, but it did not create complete self-government. Ministers responsible to elected provincial legislatures received greater powers in many areas, yet the governors retained special responsibilities and discretionary powers. They could intervene in important matters, and the wider constitutional framework continued to operate under British authority. The central government was also not fully responsible to Indian representatives, so colonial control remained substantial.

Therefore, option A is correct: the governor’s special powers and British control limited provincial autonomy. Option B is wrong because the provinces did not become fully independent. Option C is wrong because the Congress did contest the 1937 elections and formed ministries in several provinces. Option D is wrong because the centre was not entirely in Indian hands. The reform expanded participation but stopped short of responsible national government.

Related tags

Indian-Freedom-MovementGovernment-Of-India-Act-1935Provincial-Autonomy

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

Governor's special powers and British control remained

Why is this the correct answer?

The Government of India Act 1935 introduced provincial autonomy, but it did not create complete self-government. Ministers responsible to elected provincial legislatures received greater powers in many areas, yet the governors retained special responsibilities and discretionary powers. They could intervene in important matters, and the wider constitutional framework continued to operate under British authority. The central government was also not fully responsible to Indian representatives, so colonial control remained substantial.

Therefore, option A is correct: the governor’s special powers and British control limited provincial autonomy. Option B is wrong because the provinces did not become fully independent. Option C is wrong because the Congress did contest the 1937 elections and formed ministries in several provinces. Option D is wrong because the centre was not entirely in Indian hands. The reform expanded participation but stopped short of responsible national government.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 10 General Knowledge question. Chapter: Indian History. Topic: Indian Freedom Movement.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.