Why should the use of Rajan in Gana-sanghas be understood differently from modern democracy?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Power often rested with a limited elite or lineage group
In Gana-sanghas, Rajan did not mean a representative elected by all citizens in the modern democratic sense. Political participation and decision-making were often limited to elite, Kshatriya, or lineage groups, so these polities could be oligarchic. Option B describes modern universal adult political rights, which did not exist in ancient Gana-sanghas. Exam tip: Do not automatically equate an ancient gana or republic with a modern democracy.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Power often rested with a limited elite or lineage group
Why is this the correct answer?
In Gana-sanghas, Rajan did not mean a representative elected by all citizens in the modern democratic sense. Political participation and decision-making were often limited to elite, Kshatriya, or lineage groups, so these polities could be oligarchic. Option B describes modern universal adult political rights, which did not exist in ancient Gana-sanghas. Exam tip: Do not automatically equate an ancient gana or republic with a modern democracy.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 General Knowledge question. Chapter: Indian History. Topic: Ancient Indian History.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
