What was the main constitutional reason for Indian anger against the Simon Commission?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: No Indian member in the Commission
The Simon Commission was appointed in 1927 to review constitutional reforms in India, but all its members were British. The central constitutional objection was that a body considering India’s political future contained no Indian representative. This led to widespread protests and the slogan “Simon Go Back.” The salt-tax issue is more closely associated with the later Civil Disobedience Movement. Exam tip: Remember Simon Commission—1927, all-British membership, protested for excluding Indians.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
No Indian member in the Commission
Why is this the correct answer?
The Simon Commission was appointed in 1927 to review constitutional reforms in India, but all its members were British. The central constitutional objection was that a body considering India’s political future contained no Indian representative. This led to widespread protests and the slogan “Simon Go Back.” The salt-tax issue is more closely associated with the later Civil Disobedience Movement. Exam tip: Remember Simon Commission—1927, all-British membership, protested for excluding Indians.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 General Knowledge question. Chapter: Indian History. Topic: Important Revolts and Movements.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
