What is the benefit of reading oral history and archival sources together?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A more balanced historical understanding emerges by combining local memories with written evidence
Oral history brings out people’s memories, experiences, and local perspectives, while archival sources provide written documents, dates, and administrative evidence. Reading them together helps a historian identify limitations and biases and reach a more balanced conclusion. Option B is incorrect because no one type of source is automatically more reliable. Exam tip: In source-based questions, compare the perspective, purpose, and evidence of each source.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
A more balanced historical understanding emerges by combining local memories with written evidence
Why is this the correct answer?
Oral history brings out people’s memories, experiences, and local perspectives, while archival sources provide written documents, dates, and administrative evidence. Reading them together helps a historian identify limitations and biases and reach a more balanced conclusion. Option B is incorrect because no one type of source is automatically more reliable. Exam tip: In source-based questions, compare the perspective, purpose, and evidence of each source.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 General Knowledge question. Chapter: World History. Topic: Colonization and Decolonization.
