The Battle of Ghaghra is associated with which Mughal ruler?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: Babur
The Battle of Ghaghra, fought in 1529, is associated with Babur during his early campaigns to establish Mughal authority in northern India. Babur fought the combined forces of Sultanate and Afghan opponents, and the victory strengthened his position after the First Battle of Panipat in 1526 and the Battle of Khanwa in 1527. It helped consolidate the foundations of the Mughal Empire in the Gangetic region. Therefore option A is correct. Jahangir, Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb were later Mughal emperors and were not the ruler associated with this 1529 battle. Remembering the sequence of Babur's major Indian victories—Panipat, Khanwa and Ghaghra—helps distinguish this event from battles of the later Mughal period. The date and the commander together confirm the answer.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
Babur
Why is this the correct answer?
The Battle of Ghaghra, fought in 1529, is associated with Babur during his early campaigns to establish Mughal authority in northern India. Babur fought the combined forces of Sultanate and Afghan opponents, and the victory strengthened his position after the First Battle of Panipat in 1526 and the Battle of Khanwa in 1527. It helped consolidate the foundations of the Mughal Empire in the Gangetic region. Therefore option A is correct. Jahangir, Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb were later Mughal emperors and were not the ruler associated with this 1529 battle. Remembering the sequence of Babur's major Indian victories—Panipat, Khanwa and Ghaghra—helps distinguish this event from battles of the later Mughal period. The date and the commander together confirm the answer.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 General Knowledge question. Chapter: Indian History. Topic: Famous Indian Rulers.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
