In which year is the Vikram Samvat era considered to have begun?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: 57 BCE
Vikram Samvat is a traditional Indian calendar era whose beginning is conventionally placed in 57 BCE. In many historical explanations, the era is associated with King Vikramaditya, although details about the traditional origin and the historical evidence are discussed differently by scholars. For this school-level question, the expected date is therefore 57 BCE, which is option B.
The other dates represent different historical reference points or are not the accepted starting date of this era. The Saka era is commonly associated with 78 CE, so option C must not be confused with Vikram Samvat. The question asks for the conventional beginning of the Vikram era, not for a later calendar calculation or a modern calendar conversion. Thus B follows from the standard textbook convention.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
57 BCE
Why is this the correct answer?
Vikram Samvat is a traditional Indian calendar era whose beginning is conventionally placed in 57 BCE. In many historical explanations, the era is associated with King Vikramaditya, although details about the traditional origin and the historical evidence are discussed differently by scholars. For this school-level question, the expected date is therefore 57 BCE, which is option B.
The other dates represent different historical reference points or are not the accepted starting date of this era. The Saka era is commonly associated with 78 CE, so option C must not be confused with Vikram Samvat. The question asks for the conventional beginning of the Vikram era, not for a later calendar calculation or a modern calendar conversion. Thus B follows from the standard textbook convention.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 10 General Knowledge question. Chapter: Indian History. Topic: Important Dates in Indian History.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
