Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In Class 10 General Knowledge, under the Indian History chapter, this topic introduces the Indian Freedom Movement and its role in ending British colonial rule. Students learn about the growth of national consciousness, major phases of the struggle, important leaders, public participation, and the significance of independence in shaping modern India.
Practice questions
01 Why was dyarchy under the Government of India Act 1919 considered a limited reform?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because important departments remained under the Governor's control
Explanation: Dyarchy gave elected representatives limited authority. Exam tip: understand the difference between reserved and transferred subjects.
04 What kind of political language was Tagore returning his knighthood after Jallianwala Bagh?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Moral rejection of colonial honour
Explanation: The direct answer is A: moral rejection of colonial honour. After the Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 1919, Rabindranath Tagore returned the knighthood given to him by the British Crown. He did this to protest the violence and the colonial government’s conduct. Returning an official honour was a symbolic political act: it showed that respect from the colonial state could not be accepted when that state had committed grave injustice against Indians. Option A is correct because the act expressed moral condemnation and rejection of colonial prestige. Option B is wrong: Tagore’s action did not support recruitment in the British army. Option C is wrong: the Simon Commission was a later constitutional body and Tagore’s action was not a welcome for it. Option D is wrong: the act had nothing to do with a policy of separating princely states. The deeper lesson is that political resistance is not always a march or an armed action. A person can challenge power by refusing its honours, titles or symbols of legitimacy. The exam cue is “Jallianwala Bagh → Tagore returned knighthood → symbolic moral protest.”
05 What was Gandhi's main political calculation in linking Khilafat and Non-Cooperation movements?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. To unite Hindu and Muslim mass support in common anti-colonial opposition
Explanation: In 1920, Gandhi linked the Khilafat grievance with the Non-Cooperation movement to bring Muslim anti-British sentiment and the Congress struggle for swaraj onto a common platform. His key political calculation was to widen the movement's mass base through Hindu-Muslim unity. Option A is incorrect because Non-Cooperation aimed at boycotting colonial institutions, not at reducing Congress to an electoral party. Exam tip: associate the Khilafat-Non-Cooperation alliance with mass mobilisation and Hindu-Muslim unity.
07 Why was Gandhi criticised after withdrawing the movement after Chauri Chaura?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Because some leaders felt mass energy was stopped suddenly
Explanation: Gandhi prioritised non-violence but many leaders disagreed with stopping political momentum. Exam tip: study both Gandhian discipline and criticism.
11 Why is the Poorna Swaraj resolution considered a decisive turn in Congress politics?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because Congress moved beyond Dominion Status and made complete independence the goal
Explanation: The direct answer is A: Congress moved beyond Dominion Status and adopted complete independence as its goal. Dominion Status meant limited self-government while the British Crown remained supreme. At the Lahore session in December 1929, under Jawaharlal Nehru, Congress declared Poorna Swaraj. This changed the demand from freedom within the Empire to full national independence, and 26 January 1930 was observed as Independence Day. Option A is correct because it identifies this decisive change. Option B is wrong because Congress did not leave politics; it began stronger mass struggle. Option C is wrong because the British did not grant complete rights at that time. Option D is wrong because princely states did not make the Constitution. Memory cue: Lahore 1929 means Poorna Swaraj; 26 January 1930 means its public declaration.
12 What was the deeper political purpose of observing Independence Day on 26 January 1930?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. To connect people with a collective pledge of Poorna Swaraj
Explanation: Observing Independence Day on 26 January 1930 was meant to turn the declaration of Poorna Swaraj into a public act. After the Lahore Congress of December 1929, the national movement wanted people throughout India to understand that complete independence, not merely limited reforms, was the goal. People gathered, took a pledge, and expressed their commitment together.
This observance connected political leadership with ordinary citizens and made the demand for independence a shared national promise. It was not a celebration of the British army, acceptance of the Simon Commission, or a plan to restore the partition of Bengal. The year 1929 marks the declaration, while 1930 marks its public observance. Thus, option A is correct.
15 On what basis was the Gandhi-Irwin Pact criticised?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because it did not give relief to all revolutionary prisoners
Explanation: The direct answer is A: the pact did not provide relief to all revolutionary prisoners. The Gandhi-Irwin Pact was signed in March 1931 after the Civil Disobedience Movement. Congress agreed to suspend the movement and attend the Second Round Table Conference; the government agreed to release many political prisoners, return some confiscated property and allow peaceful picketing. However, the agreement did not save Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev from execution, nor did it satisfy all revolutionaries. Option A is correct because this limitation caused strong criticism. B is wrong because Congress itself was a party to the talks. C is wrong because the pact directly led to suspension of Civil Disobedience. D is wrong because it did not make India a republic. Exam cue: judge a pact by both its gains and its omissions.
18 Which broad definition of freedom is seen in the resolutions of Karachi session 1931?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Civil rights and economic justice along with political freedom
Explanation: Karachi resolutions showed the direction of rights and justice for future India. Exam tip: remember Fundamental Rights and Economic Programme.
20 The experience of Congress ministries in 1937 linked the national movement with which practical capacity?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Capacity to run provincial administration and make policies
Explanation: The direct answer is option A: Congress gained the practical capacity to run provincial administration and make policies. The Government of India Act of 1935 led to provincial elections, and Congress formed ministries in several provinces in 1937. This gave national leaders experience beyond protest and public mobilisation. They had to manage departments, prepare programmes, work with officials, make decisions about education and agriculture, and respond to public needs within the limits of colonial authority. The fact chain is: elections were held; Congress won in several provinces; ministries were formed; leaders obtained practical experience of governance. Option A is correct because it explains how the freedom movement became connected with administration and policy-making. Option B is wrong because Congress did not gain the ability to run the British army. Option C is wrong because the Simon Commission had been created earlier by the British government. Option D is wrong because separate currency for princely states was not the result of the 1937 ministries. Memory cue: 1937 Congress ministries = experience of provincial government before independence.
22 Why did Congress disagree with the minority consent condition in the August Offer 1940?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because it could create a veto-like situation in constitutional progress
Explanation: The August Offer of 1940 proposed constitutional changes but stated that no future constitution would be accepted by a substantial group unless that group agreed to it. Congress objected because such a condition could allow a minority or a separate political group to block constitutional progress. Instead of creating a clear democratic settlement, it could produce prolonged bargaining and political deadlock.
Option A is therefore correct. The offer did not give Poorna Swaraj immediately, abolish all taxes, or create the Indian National Army. The important issue was the constitutional limitation created by the requirement of minority consent, which could operate like a veto over progress.
23 What was Gandhi's aim in keeping anti-war protest limited in Individual Satyagraha?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. To assert the right to oppose India's participation in the war, without obstructing the British war effort
Explanation: Individual Satyagraha in 1940 was not intended to begin an immediate mass struggle against British rule. Gandhi sought to uphold Indians' moral and democratic right to oppose India's involvement in World War II without its consent. Therefore, satyagrahis made limited, individual and non-violent anti-war statements, avoiding direct obstruction of the British war effort. Option B is incorrect because a mass uprising was not the purpose of this restricted campaign. Exam tip: Vinoba Bhave was the first Individual Satyagrahi.
24 Why was the post-war promise of Dominion Status in Cripps Mission considered weak?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Because it did not give immediate transfer of power
Explanation: The direct answer is A. The Cripps Mission of 1942 offered Dominion Status after the Second World War, but it did not promise immediate transfer of effective power to Indian leaders. Congress wanted an immediate national government and a real share in managing the war and the country. Therefore, a promise postponed until after the war appeared weak and inadequate. Option A is correct because delay was the central problem. Option B is wrong: the proposal did not give an immediate full republic; Dominion Status is different from a republic and was not immediate. Option C is wrong: it did not make every province an independent country; the proposal concerned India’s future constitutional arrangement. Option D is wrong: ending all taxes was not the main issue and was not the reason for Congress’s rejection. The mission also raised other constitutional concerns, but among these choices A is the clear answer. Memory cue: Cripps offered “freedom later,” while Congress demanded effective power “now.”
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy