Correct answer: A. It linked self-government with both constitutional language and public propaganda
Explanation: The direct answer is A. The Home Rule Movement connected the demand for self-government with two forms of politics: constitutional argument and organised public propaganda. Leaders such as Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant explained that Indians should govern themselves and used meetings, newspapers, speeches, lectures, and local branches to spread the idea widely. In this way, it helped bring together constitutional methods associated with Moderates and the stronger public mobilisation associated with Extremists, even though the two groups did not become identical. Option A is correct because it describes this bridge accurately. Option B is wrong because the movement did not unite Indian leaders with the British army. Option C is wrong because it did not dissolve Congress; it helped revive political activity and public interest. Option D is wrong because the Salt Movement occurred later, under Gandhi, and was not started by Home Rule. The careful lesson is that Home Rule made self-government a popular and organised demand while still using constitutional language. Exam cue: Home Rule, 1916, Tilak and Annie Besant, self-government and public campaign.