Correct answer: A. It clarified the will of the people
Explanation: The direct answer is Option A: the plebiscite clarified the will of the people of Junagadh. At the time of integration after independence, Junagadh had a Muslim ruler while most of its population was Hindu, and the ruler’s decision did not match the preference widely associated with the people. A plebiscite, or vote by the people, allowed the population to express its choice directly. The result supported accession to India, so the plebiscite was important as evidence of popular will. Option B, sending the Simon Commission, is unrelated to Junagadh and belongs to the constitutional controversy of the British period. Option C, stopping the Salt Satyagraha, is unrelated; the Salt Satyagraha was a civil disobedience movement led by Gandhi in 1930. Option D, partitioning Bengal, refers to a different historical event, especially the 1905 partition and its political consequences. Thus, the key idea is that a plebiscite asks people to decide an important political question by voting. Exam cue: Junagadh is remembered for the difference between the ruler’s position and popular preference, resolved through a plebiscite.