Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In Class 10 General Knowledge, under the Indian History chapter, this topic introduces the Indian Freedom Movement and its role in ending British colonial rule. Students learn about the growth of national consciousness, major phases of the struggle, important leaders, public participation, and the significance of independence in shaping modern India.
Practice questions
01 What was the main political meaning of making Bahadur Shah Zafar the leader in the Revolt of 1857?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Giving symbolic legitimacy of old authority to the revolt
Explanation: Bahadur Shah Zafar was more a symbolic leader than a military leader. Exam tip: remember the role of Delhi in 1857.
Correct answer: D. Over leadership and method of struggle
Explanation: Direct answer: Option D. The Surat Split of 1907 reflected a deeper disagreement between the Moderates and Extremists within the Indian National Congress. The conflict concerned leadership, control of the organisation, and the preferred method of struggle. Moderates generally favoured constitutional and gradual methods, while Extremists supported stronger mass pressure, boycott, and more assertive action. Option A is wrong because the conference venue was not the real historical issue. Option B is wrong because language policy was not the central cause. Option C is wrong because the dispute was not simply about tax collection. Option D is correct because it captures both leadership and strategy. The split weakened unity temporarily, though the wider freedom movement continued. Memory cue: Surat 1907 means Moderate–Extremist leadership and strategy conflict.
09 What was the dual character of the Lucknow Pact?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. It showed Congress-League cooperation but also accepted separate electorates
Explanation: The direct answer is B: the Pact showed Congress–League cooperation but also accepted separate electorates. The Lucknow Pact was concluded in 1916 between the Indian National Congress and the All-India Muslim League. Its positive side was cooperation: both organisations came together and presented common constitutional demands, showing an important moment of political unity. Its limiting or problematic side was Congress’s acceptance of separate electorates for Muslims, a system in which members of a community voted for representatives from that community’s separate electoral arrangement. Therefore the Pact had a dual character—unity and cooperation on one side, but acceptance of a communal political arrangement on the other. Option B is correct because it includes both parts. Option A is false: the Pact did not end Congress or create the League; both already existed. Option C is false: it did not make India a republic and did not stop the Constitution. Option D is false: the Salt Tax issue and closing the press were not the defining features of the Lucknow Pact. Do not remember only its unity; remember its compromise and later criticism too. Memory cue: Lucknow 1916 means Congress–League unity plus separate electorates.
11 What was the basis of refusing revenue payment in Kheda Satyagraha?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Crop failure and peasants' inability to pay
Explanation: Direct answer: Option B is correct. The Kheda Satyagraha of 1918 was connected with a serious agricultural problem. Crop failure reduced the peasants’ income, so many cultivators could not pay the land revenue demanded by the colonial government. They asked for revenue suspension or relief according to the situation. Step by step, poor harvest caused low income; low income caused inability to pay; the demand for relief led to satyagraha. Option A is wrong because the Simon Commission came later, in 1928, and was not the basis of Kheda. Option C is wrong because integration of princely states happened mainly after independence. Option D is wrong because Partition occurred in 1947, decades later. Exam cue: Kheda means crop failure, inability to pay, and demand for revenue relief.
18 What message did opposition to Simon Commission give in Indian politics?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Indian opinion is essential on India's constitution
Explanation: Direct answer: Option A. The Simon Commission was appointed by the British government to examine constitutional reforms in India, but it had no Indian member. Its opposition therefore expressed that Indians must have a meaningful voice in deciding their constitutional and political future. Option A is correct because the protest demanded Indian participation and representation. Option B is the opposite of the historical message: Indians rejected the idea that a British-only commission was sufficient. Option C is wrong because the movement showed active political involvement, not rejection of politics. Option D is unrelated; the protest was not a demand for peasants to leave movements. The slogan “Simon Go Back” captures the public rejection. Memory cue: no Indian member led to “Simon Go Back” and the demand for Indian opinion.
20 What was the political significance of observing Independence Day on 26 January 1930?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Connecting people with the pledge of Poorna Swaraj
Explanation: Direct answer: Option A is correct. On 26 January 1930, people across India observed Independence Day after the Congress had declared Poorna Swaraj, or complete independence, as its goal. The day was politically important because it converted a resolution into a public promise and encouraged ordinary people to associate themselves with the national demand. The reasoning is: complete independence was declared; people took a pledge; the pledge was observed publicly on the chosen date; mass participation gave the demand wider strength. Option A works for this reason. Option B is wrong because the day was not meant to increase salt tax; salt tax was later challenged through the Civil Disobedience Movement. Option C is wrong because the Simon Commission had already been appointed and was not sent on this date. Option D is wrong because princely-state integration was a later issue. Memory cue: 26 January 1930 means the public pledge of Poorna Swaraj.
21 What was the strategic purpose of the long foot march in Dandi March?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. To connect people by spreading the message in villages
Explanation: The direct answer is A: “To connect people by spreading the message in villages.” The Dandi March of 1930 was not only a walk from Sabarmati to the coastal village of Dandi. It was also a carefully chosen method of mass mobilisation and political communication. As Gandhi and the marchers passed through villages, they met ordinary people, explained the injustice of the Salt Law and encouraged participation in the Civil Disobedience Movement. The long journey attracted public attention and helped turn a specific law into a national issue. Option A is correct because the march carried the message into villages and built public support. Option B is wrong because it had nothing to do with holding a parade for the British army. Option C is wrong because restoring Company rule was opposite to the nationalist objective; the movement challenged colonial rule. Option D is wrong because the march was not intended to threaten princely states. Its target was the colonial Salt Law and wider imperial authority. Exam cue: Dandi March means salt protest plus mass contact, communication and mobilisation.
23 What was one criticism of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact?
0 reads0 helpful★ – (0)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. It did not accept the demand for the release of all revolutionary prisoners
Explanation: A major criticism of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931) was that it did not secure the release of revolutionary prisoners such as Bhagat Singh. Under the pact, Congress agreed to suspend the Civil Disobedience Movement and to attend the Second Round Table Conference; therefore, B and D were outcomes of the pact, not criticisms. Exam tip: distinguish the terms of an agreement from the objections raised against it.
☆No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful ·👎 0 Not helpful
Difficulty
Easy0%
Medium0%
Hard0%
Was the explanation clear?
Yes 0%·No 0%
0 responses
Student Reviews
No published reviews yet.
Analytics choices
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy