Correct answer: B. Because land, tenancy and agrarian discontent were also involved
Explanation: Direct answer: Option B, land, tenancy, and agrarian discontent were also involved. The Moplah Rebellion in Malabar was complex and should not be reduced to a single religious explanation. Step by step, many Moplah peasants were tenants, and issues such as rent, insecure tenancy, landlord control, land rights, and economic hardship created deep agrarian tension. These material grievances existed alongside religious, political, and anti-colonial factors, and the events also involved serious violence and communal dimensions. A careful historical answer therefore recognises more than one cause. Option A is wrong because the Moplah Rebellion was not the Chipko Movement, which belongs to a much later forest-protection context. Option B is correct because land and tenancy grievances formed an important part of the background. Option C is wrong because an INA trial was a different historical event. Option D is wrong because Bhoodan was a later voluntary land-gift movement associated with Vinoba Bhave. Memory cue: interpret complex revolts through social, economic, political, and religious contexts together.