महाद्वीपों के साइमा में हल की तरह चलने की धारणा पर आपत्ति क्यों हुई?

Why was there an objection to the idea of continents ploughing through sima?

Explanation opens after your attempt
Correct Answer

C. क्योंकि कठोर आधार को चीरकर चलना भौतिक रूप से असंगत माना गयाBecause moving through a rigid base was considered physically inconsistent

Step 1

Concept

Continents ploughing through a rigid oceanic base was considered scientifically weak. Exam tip: write it as mechanical criticism.

Step 2

Why this answer is correct

The correct answer is C. क्योंकि कठोर आधार को चीरकर चलना भौतिक रूप से असंगत माना गया / Because moving through a rigid base was considered physically inconsistent. Continents ploughing through a rigid oceanic base was considered scientifically weak. Exam tip: write it as mechanical criticism.

Step 3

Exam Tip

महाद्वीपों का कठोर महासागरीय आधार को चीरना वैज्ञानिक रूप से कमजोर माना गया। परीक्षा में इसे यांत्रिक आलोचना लिखें।

Question me issue ya doubt hai?

Answer, explanation, typing mistake ya suggestion directly hamari team ko bhejein. 📱Helpline (Call / WhatsApp): +91 7272824365

Related Geography Questions

FAQs

Geography Answer, Explanation and Revision Hints

महाद्वीपों के साइमा में हल की तरह चलने की धारणा पर आपत्ति क्यों हुई? / Why was there an objection to the idea of continents ploughing through sima?

Correct Answer: C. क्योंकि कठोर आधार को चीरकर चलना भौतिक रूप से असंगत माना गया / Because moving through a rigid base was considered physically inconsistent. Explanation: महाद्वीपों का कठोर महासागरीय आधार को चीरना वैज्ञानिक रूप से कमजोर माना गया। परीक्षा में इसे यांत्रिक आलोचना लिखें। / Continents ploughing through a rigid oceanic base was considered scientifically weak. Exam tip: write it as mechanical criticism.

Which concept should I revise for this Geography MCQ?

Continents ploughing through a rigid oceanic base was considered scientifically weak. Exam tip: write it as mechanical criticism.

What exam hint can help solve this Geography question?

महाद्वीपों का कठोर महासागरीय आधार को चीरना वैज्ञानिक रूप से कमजोर माना गया। परीक्षा में इसे यांत्रिक आलोचना लिखें।